In the studies on Wittgenstein, the house he designed and planned in Kundmanngasse for his sister Margaret between 1926 and 1928, is usually considered an exemplification of his philosophical thought. The aim of this paper is to reverse this approach, appreciating Wittgenstein’s experience as an architect as one of the decisive stages of his philosophical development. In the first two paragraphs, I will show that Kundmanngasse House cannot be understood only as a representation of the philosophy of the "Tractatus", nor only as an anticipation of "Philosophical Investigations", even if it is possible to discover in it some Tractarian elements and some intuitions developed after his return to Cambridge. Paying attention to Wittgenstein’s biographical data and to the cultural context of his work as an architect, I will suggest the relevance of Schopenhauer’s reflections about architecture in order to appreciate the Margarete Stonborough-Wittgenstein's House as a gesture. Following this clue, I will conclude that an architectural gesture is not only a representation of a thought, but a revelation of the will.
Negli studi su Wittgenstein, la casa da lui progettata nella Kundmanngasse per la sorella Margaret tra il 1926 e il 1928 è solitamente considerata un'esemplificazione del suo pensiero filosofico. L'obiettivo di questo articolo è quello di invertire questo approccio, apprezzando l'esperienza di Wittgenstein come architetto come una delle tappe decisive del suo sviluppo filosofico. Nei primi due paragrafi, mostrerò che la casa nella Kundmanngasse non può essere intesa solo come una rappresentazione della filosofia del "Tractatus", né solo come un'anticipazione delle "Ricerche filosofiche", anche se è possibile scoprire in essa alcuni elementi del Tractatus e alcune intuizioni sviluppate dopo il suo ritorno a Cambridge. Prestando attenzione ai dati biografici di Wittgenstein e al contesto culturale del suo lavoro di architetto, suggerirò la rilevanza delle riflessioni di Schopenhauer sull'architettura per cogliere alcune particolarità architettoniche della casa di Margarete Stonborough-Wittgenstein. Seguendo questo indizio, concluderò che un gesto architettonico non è solo la rappresentazione di un pensiero, ma una rivelazione della volontà.
Wittgenstein's House and Architecture as a Gesture
Damonte M
2021-01-01
Abstract
In the studies on Wittgenstein, the house he designed and planned in Kundmanngasse for his sister Margaret between 1926 and 1928, is usually considered an exemplification of his philosophical thought. The aim of this paper is to reverse this approach, appreciating Wittgenstein’s experience as an architect as one of the decisive stages of his philosophical development. In the first two paragraphs, I will show that Kundmanngasse House cannot be understood only as a representation of the philosophy of the "Tractatus", nor only as an anticipation of "Philosophical Investigations", even if it is possible to discover in it some Tractarian elements and some intuitions developed after his return to Cambridge. Paying attention to Wittgenstein’s biographical data and to the cultural context of his work as an architect, I will suggest the relevance of Schopenhauer’s reflections about architecture in order to appreciate the Margarete Stonborough-Wittgenstein's House as a gesture. Following this clue, I will conclude that an architectural gesture is not only a representation of a thought, but a revelation of the will.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



