High Voltage Direct Current transmission systems have become increasingly strategic for the efficient and reliable transfer of electrical power over long distances, particularly in submarine applications. The use of return electrodes in HVDC systems can be a valuable choice for providing a low-resistance current path both in Monopolar and Bipolar links, taking advantage of seawater as conductive medium. This solution is generally more cost-effective and has lower electrical losses compared to Dedicated Metallic Return conductors. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative cost analysis between a system with submarine electrodes and the same one with a dedicated metallic return. It seeks to identify the break-even point at which submarine electrodes become more advantageous than dedicated metallic returns for a typical 1 GW HVDC submarine link. Additionally, it compares the costs associated with electrical losses between the two solutions both for Bipolar and Monopolar links. Eventually, the paper provides an overview of the potential impact of an offshore electrode on the environment and metallic infrastructure and how it can be mitigated through a scrupulous design and careful site selection.
Submarine Return Electrodes vs. Dedicated Metallic Returns: A Comparative Cost/Benefit Analysis
Mario Nervi
2025-01-01
Abstract
High Voltage Direct Current transmission systems have become increasingly strategic for the efficient and reliable transfer of electrical power over long distances, particularly in submarine applications. The use of return electrodes in HVDC systems can be a valuable choice for providing a low-resistance current path both in Monopolar and Bipolar links, taking advantage of seawater as conductive medium. This solution is generally more cost-effective and has lower electrical losses compared to Dedicated Metallic Return conductors. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative cost analysis between a system with submarine electrodes and the same one with a dedicated metallic return. It seeks to identify the break-even point at which submarine electrodes become more advantageous than dedicated metallic returns for a typical 1 GW HVDC submarine link. Additionally, it compares the costs associated with electrical losses between the two solutions both for Bipolar and Monopolar links. Eventually, the paper provides an overview of the potential impact of an offshore electrode on the environment and metallic infrastructure and how it can be mitigated through a scrupulous design and careful site selection.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Submarine_Return_Electrodes_vs._Dedicated_Metallic_Returns_A_Comparative_Cost_Benefit_Analysis.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
681.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
681.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



