The text aims to analyze, through the tools of argumentative analysis, the reasons offered, in the Gabriele case, by the Court of Appeal and by the Court of Cassation. First, the text critically describes the reasoning of the Appeal Court on the evaluation of the evidentiary elements and their strength. Then, the paper discusses the legitimacy check developed by the Court of Cassation on the Appeal’s evidentiary reasoning. It is argued that the rulings have achieved partially acceptable results. The outcomes are epistemologically acceptable, but legally more controversial

Il caso Gabriele: un’analisi logico-argomentativa della motivazione probatoria d’Appello e del suo controllo di legittimità

Elena Marchese
2023-01-01

Abstract

The text aims to analyze, through the tools of argumentative analysis, the reasons offered, in the Gabriele case, by the Court of Appeal and by the Court of Cassation. First, the text critically describes the reasoning of the Appeal Court on the evaluation of the evidentiary elements and their strength. Then, the paper discusses the legitimacy check developed by the Court of Cassation on the Appeal’s evidentiary reasoning. It is argued that the rulings have achieved partially acceptable results. The outcomes are epistemologically acceptable, but legally more controversial
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1237555
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact