Among the hundreds of place-names of Proto-Indo-European antiquity (i.e. prior to the diachronic transformations into the phonological systems of each Indo-European subgroup), stretching from Europe’s Atlantic Façade to Upper Mesopotamia, ten must and five preferably presuppose specific palaeogeographical contexts (with which ten further place-names are compatible). Next to Anatolia, where at least thirty-seven place-names are of Proto-Indo-European date, about twenty geographical names of the same stratum in the Levant can be best assigned to the 62% of local Neolithic to Bronze-Age population from the Anatolian and Iranian plateaux. In such a way, Palaeo-Geography can date (at least with a tĕrmĭnŭs ăntĕ qu̯ĕm) the imposition – to localized geographical points – of names which Linguistic Reconstruction independently assigns to a specific diachronic phase; this, in turn, connects Population Genetics (whose locations and dates cannot affect linguistic entities) on one side and geographically opaque Linguistic Periodization / Glottochronology on the other.

Dove e quando è stato parlato l’indoeuropeo preistorico?

Borghi, Guido
2025-01-01

Abstract

Among the hundreds of place-names of Proto-Indo-European antiquity (i.e. prior to the diachronic transformations into the phonological systems of each Indo-European subgroup), stretching from Europe’s Atlantic Façade to Upper Mesopotamia, ten must and five preferably presuppose specific palaeogeographical contexts (with which ten further place-names are compatible). Next to Anatolia, where at least thirty-seven place-names are of Proto-Indo-European date, about twenty geographical names of the same stratum in the Levant can be best assigned to the 62% of local Neolithic to Bronze-Age population from the Anatolian and Iranian plateaux. In such a way, Palaeo-Geography can date (at least with a tĕrmĭnŭs ăntĕ qu̯ĕm) the imposition – to localized geographical points – of names which Linguistic Reconstruction independently assigns to a specific diachronic phase; this, in turn, connects Population Genetics (whose locations and dates cannot affect linguistic entities) on one side and geographically opaque Linguistic Periodization / Glottochronology on the other.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BORGHI, Dove e quando è stato parlato l’indoeuropeo preistorico copia.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 3.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.36 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1271056
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact