Il divieto del terzo mandato consecutivo in Campania e l’elezione diretta dei Presidenti

This paper begins with an analysis of Constitutional Court judgment no. 64 of 2025 in order to better focus on the most critical aspects highlighted therein first and foremost the Court’s classification of the ban on a third regional mandate among the causes of ineligibility provided for in Article 122(1) of the Constitution. It then seeks to examine the implications arising from the (necessary) connection between that ban and the form of government based on direct election chosen by the regional legislature, as well as the temporal consequences this link has had for the operation of the ban. The aim is to move beyond the regional dimension and assess the feasibility of grounding the principles set out in the ruling within a broader constitutional framework.