Bolivar-Feriche et al. (2025) conducted an integrated biostratigraphic study of some stratigraphic sections cropping out at the Sierra de Marmolance (SE Spain), proposing a signifi cant extension of the chronos- tratigraphic ranges of several well-established Paleogene larger benthic foraminifera (LBF) into the Neogene (Middle Miocene; Langhian–Serravallian). While we agree with the taxonomic attributions of the planktonic foraminifera, we just underline the fact that their sampling locations and stratimetric correlation, although cru- cial in the general rationale, remain rather vague. Our main concern is with regards to the interpretation of the LBF assemblages as autochthonous. We suggest the most plausible interpretation, i.e., the reworking of LBF within a prograding ramp system, thus rebutting the newly proposed biostratigraphic ranges, which are both im- plausible and also in confl ict with well-constrained ranges calibrated in all sections measured elsewhere in the Tethyan realm and beyond.

Comment on “Chronostratigraphic ranges of Early–Middle Miocene larger benthic foraminifera calibrated by planktonic foraminiferal assemblages (Sierra de Marmolance, Granada, SE Spain)” by Bolivar-Feriche et al. (2025)

Cesare A. Papazzoni;Andrea Benedetti;Antonino Briguglio;Lorenzo Consorti;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Bolivar-Feriche et al. (2025) conducted an integrated biostratigraphic study of some stratigraphic sections cropping out at the Sierra de Marmolance (SE Spain), proposing a signifi cant extension of the chronos- tratigraphic ranges of several well-established Paleogene larger benthic foraminifera (LBF) into the Neogene (Middle Miocene; Langhian–Serravallian). While we agree with the taxonomic attributions of the planktonic foraminifera, we just underline the fact that their sampling locations and stratimetric correlation, although cru- cial in the general rationale, remain rather vague. Our main concern is with regards to the interpretation of the LBF assemblages as autochthonous. We suggest the most plausible interpretation, i.e., the reworking of LBF within a prograding ramp system, thus rebutting the newly proposed biostratigraphic ranges, which are both im- plausible and also in confl ict with well-constrained ranges calibrated in all sections measured elsewhere in the Tethyan realm and beyond.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1299116
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact