This study assessed the preliminary results of an experimental protocol evaluating the impact of positive expectations on fingertip-to-floor distance during forward bending. Thirty-six participants were assigned to three groups, each receiving a sham physical manipulation in Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR). The first group received a neutral statement about the manipulation’s efficacy, while the second and third groups were told the manipulation would improve forward bending, emphasising its fictious positive effect to increase expectations for a beneficial motor improvement. Additionally, the third group also experienced a visual-haptic illusion, by lifting a tile in front of participants and raising the floor in the virtual scenario, creating the belief of reaching the floor thanks to the received manipulation. Fingertip-to-floor distance was measured at baseline, immediately after the manipulation (after-effect), and five minutes later (follow-up). Differences between baseline and after-effect/follow-up distances represented the gained distances. Only the third group, which experienced the combined effect of positive verbal statement reinforced by the visual-haptic illusion, showed a significant increase in gained distance during the after-effect and follow-up phases compared to the neutral statement group. These findings support the potential of this multifactorial intervention to promote motor improvement by enhancing positive expectations.
A surprise induced by a visual-haptic illusion in virtual reality can lead to motor improvement
Job M.;Manoni M.;Sansone L. G.;Viceconti A.;Testa M.
2025-01-01
Abstract
This study assessed the preliminary results of an experimental protocol evaluating the impact of positive expectations on fingertip-to-floor distance during forward bending. Thirty-six participants were assigned to three groups, each receiving a sham physical manipulation in Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR). The first group received a neutral statement about the manipulation’s efficacy, while the second and third groups were told the manipulation would improve forward bending, emphasising its fictious positive effect to increase expectations for a beneficial motor improvement. Additionally, the third group also experienced a visual-haptic illusion, by lifting a tile in front of participants and raising the floor in the virtual scenario, creating the belief of reaching the floor thanks to the received manipulation. Fingertip-to-floor distance was measured at baseline, immediately after the manipulation (after-effect), and five minutes later (follow-up). Differences between baseline and after-effect/follow-up distances represented the gained distances. Only the third group, which experienced the combined effect of positive verbal statement reinforced by the visual-haptic illusion, showed a significant increase in gained distance during the after-effect and follow-up phases compared to the neutral statement group. These findings support the potential of this multifactorial intervention to promote motor improvement by enhancing positive expectations.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



